Houston – Houstonians filed 2,179 complaints about missed garbage pickup in the past four weeks, according to city 311 data pulled Friday. That makes it the single most reported problem in Houston right now.
It’s been getting worse. Over the past 12 months, missed garbage complaints climbed from 35,675 to 39,146. Missed heavy trash pickup nearly doubled the past 12 weeks alone, jumping from 2,916 to 5,440 complaints.
Recommended Videos
Steven David, Deputy Chief of Staff for Mayor John Whitmire, says the reasons go back years, and they start with a piece of infrastructure most Houstonians have never heard of.
Transfer Stations
Most people assume a garbage truck drives straight from their curb to a landfill. It doesn’t.
“Trucks, goes to the transfer station, which is close,” David explained to KPRC 2 News. “We have geographically dispersed ones. Dumps the trash haul, goes back into the neighborhood. Transfer station people bundle it up, put it on an 18-Wheeler, 18-Wheeler [takes it] to the landfill.”
The transfer station is the hub. It keeps neighborhood trucks on short routes and lets larger vehicles make the long haul to the landfill efficiently. Houston has five of them, positioned across the city to serve different areas.
Two are currently functioning, one in southeast Houston, and one in the southwest. The three others tell a more complicated story. The northeast station on Neches Street is under construction. The northwest station on Sommermeyer has been closed and has a demolition scheduled for June. The fifth, on Central Street, is among those David describes as effectively abandoned.
“The three that are not functioning [have] like giant holes in the roof, flocks of birds have moved in. There was a story about a couple of wild hogs that like ran off a couple folks in one of the other non-functioning ones,” David said.
Compounded decisions
David traced the deterioration to a policy decision made by a previous administration. The Solid Waste Department was allowed to stop contributing to what the city calls the Maintenance and Renewal Fund. It’s a general fund mechanism that pays for facility upkeep across departments.
He says the department took over its own maintenance.
RELATED: Houston mayor proposes new $5 monthly ‘administrative fee’ tied to trash service starting next year
“And the previous administration said, okay, that’s fine,” David adds. “What do you think the first thing was that they cut whenever they said you got to reduce your budget? Maintenance of the facilities.”
With three stations offline, trucks that would normally drop off nearby are rerouting to the two remaining facilities. Routes get longer. Shifts run over. Drivers collect overtime. Fewer pickups happen per day.
“We can’t improve these transfer stations, which creates longer route times, which creates longer work hours, which creates overtime for the department,” David said. “We can’t fix those because we can’t afford the capex, because it’s a general fund department. And it’s not fee-supported.”
The revenue sitting in rubble
The broken stations aren’t just costing the city money but they’re also preventing potential revenue.
“Transfer stations are really interesting,” said David. “They are like cash cow opportunities for a municipality.”
Right now, Houston contracts with a third-party vendor to operate its transfer stations who consolidates Houston’s trash and takes it out to the landfill at no charge to the city.
Because of the cuts to the department, David says all the city can do is support its drivers.
“They get to charge all the third-party companies, so the Texas Pride Disposals, BFIs, Waste Management’s, and they charge them $75 a ton,” he said. “We’ve done financial modeling. If we had all five transfer stations in our portfolio and we were running them, we’d make anywhere between $20 and $25 million dollars.”
The proposed fix
The Whitmire administration’s Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) budget proposes converting Solid Waste into a municipal utility. The same model Houston uses for water and wastewater. That designation would come with a monthly fee charged to households, starting at $5 per month in FY27, and rising by $5 every year until it reaches $25 per month in Fiscal Year 2032.
The fee would allow the city to borrow against projected revenue.
“Whenever we bring in new revenue, we can issue debt against it,” David said. “So, we can immediately start to purchase more vehicles and fix those facilities and begin making money on those facilities.”
Houston would essentially charge less than cities around it. Documents he showed KPRC 2 News state Pasadena charges roughly $34 per month. Pearland charges $23. League City charges around $22. San Antonio, Dallas, Austin, Fort Worth, El Paso, and Arlington all fund solid waste through dedicated monthly fees. Houston according to the proposed budget we saw shows it’s the outlier among major Texas cities.
What’s at stake
The city’s five-year general fund outlook, shown to KPRC 2 News, shows a fund balance turning negative by FY27 without structural changes. The solid waste fee is one of two major reforms proposed. The other is a right-of-way rental fee charged to utilities that occupy public streets. That together are projected to bring roughly $200 million in new revenue, allowing the city to stay in positive until Fiscal Year 2030.
Without the fee, David believes the city has no path to fixing the transfer stations. Without fixed transfer stations, the routes stay long, overtime remains high, and the 311 queue keeps growing.
The construction activity at the northwest station and the pending demolition of the northwest facility suggests the city has already begun moving on some of its infrastructure. If the budget is approved, it would determine how quickly the three transfer stations come online.