During his State of the Union address, President Donald Trump urged Congress to pass the SAVE Act, a proposal that has quickly become the latest flashpoint in the national fight over election security and voting access.
Supporters argue the bill would strengthen confidence in U.S. elections. Critics say it would create new barriers for eligible voters and revive old battles over voter suppression.
Recommended Videos
WHAT IS THE SAVE ACT?
The SAVE Act, formally the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act would require people registering to vote in federal elections to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship, such as a birth certificate or passport. It would also direct states to remove non‑citizens from voter rolls.
Non‑citizens are already barred from voting in federal and state elections, and it is a crime to do so. Backers of the bill say national standards are needed to ensure voter rolls are accurate and to reassure Americans that only eligible citizens are voting.
Opponents counter that documented cases of non‑citizen voting are extremely rare and that the new requirements would disproportionately burden eligible voters who lack easy access to documents.
LOCAL CONTEXT: HARRIS COUNTY AND ELECTION INTEGRITY FIGHTS
The debate comes against the backdrop of ongoing tension over elections in Harris County, one of the largest voting jurisdictions in the country.
In January, KPRC 2’s Rilwan Balogun examined claims about “election integrity” after Gov. Greg Abbott called Harris County a “repeat violator of election integrity” and floated the idea of a state takeover of local elections.
Harris County leaders pushed back, calling those claims politically motivated and not supported by evidence of widespread fraud.
“It’s quite clear this is about continuing to politicize our elections,” Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo told KPRC 2 at the time. “Our former DA tried to prosecute voter fraud and didn’t find anyone who voted under inappropriate circumstances.”
That history shapes how local officials and experts are viewing the SAVE Act now.
SUPPORTERS: “CONSISTENCY” AND CONFIDENCE IN THE SYSTEM
Harris County Republican Party Chair Cindy Siegel said she sees the SAVE Act as a step toward uniform rules and stronger voter confidence.
“I think it will make it consistent across the country,” she said, “Here in Texas, we already require some sort of photo ID or some sort of documentation when you go to vote. And you know, it’s illegal to not be a citizen and try to vote, but I do believe it’ll make it consistent.”
Siegel said concerns about fraud and security are not limited to one party.
“I mean, you hear it across the board,” she said. “This way, I think that people will be able to trust the fact that when someone votes, they are who they say they are, and they are a citizen. You have to have a photo ID for almost everything… you fly, you get on a Greyhound bus, you’ve got to produce some sort of photo ID.”
Her bottom line, “I think this is one more way that we can encourage all Americans to have the confidence that that final count, and who’s voting, are really people who should be voting.”
OPPONENTS: “A SOLUTION IN SEARCH OF A PROBLEM”
Harris County Democratic Party Chair Mike Doyle strongly opposes the measure, arguing that similar efforts in Texas have already shown how ID and documentation rules can cut people off from the ballot.
“Abbott and the Texas Republicans have already shown us how this is a terrible idea and all about voter suppression,” Doyle said.
“They passed this bill more or less back in 2013 at midnight after the Supreme Court allowed them to pass laws without preclearance of the Civil Rights Act,” Doyle said. “About 600,000 Texans were more or less removed from the roll just like that. So, this midnight bill that they passed in Texas has already demonstrated this is all about voter suppression, not actually protecting against a real problem.”
Carroll Robinson, a political science professor at Texas Southern University, called the SAVE Act “a solution looking for a problem,” pointing to what he says is a very small number of proven cases of non‑citizen voting.
“If you look back over the last 50 years of election fraud litigation, not allegations, but fraud litigation there’s been minuscule litigation around illegal non‑citizen voting,” he said. “There has been more litigation about Americans who are not registered to vote voting than non‑citizens voting.”
Robinson also raised concerns if the bill were to pass, what kind of implications it would have on ordinary voters.
“Most Americans don’t have a passport,” he said. “Most Americans can’t find their birth certificate. Most Americans have moved from the place where they were born, and they’re going to have to incur the additional cost of tracking down their birth certificate.”
He argued that, if passed, the law could have unintended consequences for the very voters some Republicans rely on.
“The Republicans in Congress think they’re going to reduce minority voter participation,” Robinson said. “It’s going to have a bigger impact on white voters in small rural areas across the country if they pass the legislation.”
Siegel, who grew up in rural northwest Kansas, pushed back on the idea that rural voters would be disproportionately harmed.
“I grew up on a farm in Northwest Kansas, and I know the rural community well. I don’t think it will,” she said. “If you want to be truthful, I think it’s probably easier for them.”
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
Robinson said he is skeptical that the SAVE Act will ultimately become law in its current form, predicting a tough path in the Senate.
“They’ll probably have to try to rush it through a lame duck session,” he said. “I don’t think Democrats in the Senate are not going to filibuster the bill on the Senate side.”
Still, the debate over the bill underscores how central voting rules and perceptions of election legitimacy have become in American politics.
Robinson said that if voters feel democracy is at risk, they tend to respond at the ballot box.
“What we are seeing over the last several months, going back to 2025 off‑year elections, is that when democracy is in trouble, people show up to vote,” he said. “When things are going good, they have no reason to turn out in mass numbers. But when they think something is wrong, you’re not doing a good job, you’re making mistakes, you’re taking them for granted, they will show up to vote.”
As the SAVE Act moves through Congress, both sides say they are watching closely not just for what it could mean in Washington, but for how it could reshape who can vote, and how easily, in places like Harris County and across Texas.