Senate committee advances nomination of U.S. Rep. John Ratcliffe for director of national intelligence

Photo does not have a caption

U.S. Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Heath, testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee on May 5, 2020. Andrew Harnik/Pool via REUTERS

The Senate Intelligence Committee moved in a party-line vote Tuesday to advance the nomination of U.S. Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Heath, for director of national intelligence. The move sends the nomination to the full Senate, which is expected to confirm Ratcliffe.

This is the second time President Donald Trump has tapped Ratcliffe for the cabinet-level position, which oversees 17 intelligence agencies. Last summer, Ratcliffe's nod was derailed quickly due to concerns about his political background and questions over whether he inflated parts of his biography. This time, Ratcliffe appears on track to be confirmed, with little ongoing discussion of the major issues highlighted in the last go around.

The job has been filled by acting appointees since Dan Coats resigned last summer.

Ratcliffe has long been a vocal ally for Trump. He was a major defender of the president throughout the 2019 impeachment proceedings, in both private and public hearings. He berated former special counsel Robert Mueller, who investigated Russian interference in the 2016 election, when Mueller appeared before the House in July. Ratcliffe argued Mueller went beyond his bounds when he said investigation didn't exonerate the president or determine the president's innocence.

Axios, when it broke the news that Ratcliffe had been selected, said Trump had been pleased by Ratcliffe's public, aggressive questioning of Mueller in the hearing.

Shortly after Trump named Ratcliffe his choice last year, the Washington Post reported that a claim on Ratcliffe's website of arresting "over 300 illegal immigrants on a single day" as a federal prosecuting attorney was a significant exaggeration.

The sweep happened at poultry processing plants in 2008, targeting workers suspected of using stolen Social Security numbers. Forty-five workers were charged and six were dismissed. Two of the cases were dismissed because the defendants were American citizens. One former investigator called the investigation a costly failure. The claim is still on his website.