A common surgery for women has been plagued by lawsuits and government warnings.
In a small downtown conference room, four women gathered to share a common story of pain and altered lives. Each woman detailed what they described as severe complications from the use of medical mesh to treat a common problem.
Many women experience a condition called Pelvic Organ Prolapse, in which organs in the pelvic region begin to move or sag, triggering a number of problems including pain, incontinence and intimacy issues. This problem can be corrected through an invasive procedure that lifts and stitches the organs back in place. Another less-invasive procedure involves placing medical mesh to prop up and hold organs in place.
"No discussion, just that would be the best way to do it and easy," said Beatrice Santillan.
Santillan and three other women who spoke with Local 2 Investigates said none of their doctors told them there was an alternative to using mesh.
"She said, 'This is fine. We've done a lot of these in the past,'" said another woman who asked not to be identified. "So you feel OK. It's all right. She said, 'It's OK', and she's a doctor."
All four women said soon after having the mesh inserted, they began experiencing complications.
"It's changed everything. It's changed everything," said Janet Dotson, a former librarian. "The standing and lifting, I would just bleed, hurt, go home hurting. It just wasn't normal and it's still that way right now."
"I couldn't jump and run," said Janet Kramer, a physical education teacher. "I was an avid runner, I loved to run. Had to quit doing that and even to this day, I can't do it anymore."
"When I would sit down, it would feel like I was sitting on straight pins," said another woman. "I'm a seamstress and I can't sit down at a sewing machine and you're bleeding all the time, so you don't know what the problem is."
"Can't run with my kids. You know that's what I wanted -- to run with them, play basketball and volleyball, but I can't," said Santillan.
All four women said after months of complaining of problems, the mesh had to be removed. However, in all these cases, except for Kramer, the women said doctors could not remove all of the mesh.
"He told me, 'Look, I can't get to all of it. Some of it's in scar tissue,'" said one woman who recounted a conversation with her doctor regarding mesh removal. "'I can't guarantee you're not going to have any problems in the future.' He said, 'I can't guarantee that.'"
Santillan said she has lost all control of her bowel movements because of complications from mesh.
"I have to carry extra clothing wherever I go, " said Santillan.
Dotson said she has been told her entire bladder will have to be reconstructed.
"I don't have insurance so I don't know when I can have that done," said Dotson.
"Frequently, doctors can't get all the mesh out," said Georgia attorney Henry Garrard III.
Garrard said he represents 300 women in 34 states complaining of mesh-related complications. Garrard also represents the four women who spoke with Local 2.
"I have had doctors explain to me it's like picking little pieces of shattered glass out," said Garrard.
Lawsuits and government warnings contend the mesh moves, erodes and breaks apart once inside a woman's pelvis, making complete removal of the product difficult.
"Most of the time (doctors) have to take out tissue," said Garrard. "When they put it back together, you can't put it back like God made it."
Garrard represents women suing the leading manufacturer of medical mesh, New Jersey-based C.R. Bard. Local 2 tried several times to reach Bard officials via phone and email, but received no response.
"It's mostly surgical error," said Houston urogynecological surgeon Dr. Christopher Jayne. "It's mostly surgeon error."